Example review recordSample only
Public product pageWhat changed, and does it need a response?Assigned reviewerNeeds review
Signal Desk · On page work sample
Research review workflow.
An illustrative sequence for turning a public observation into a research record and a reviewed decision.
The sequence
Five steps from source to review.
A proposed sequence for a source, a reviewer, and a recorded decision.
- 01
Choose a public source
Start with one page or feed you are allowed to monitor.
- 02
Capture the evidence
Save the URL, timestamp, and a short excerpt in the same record.
- 03
Write a review prompt
Ask a focused question about the change worth checking.
- 04
Make the human call
A reviewer separates what the source says from what it might mean.
- 05
Keep a queue
Pass the reviewed record to a Google Sheets handoff for follow up.
Guardrail
Keep the source attached to the note.
The original observation stays attached to its source URL and timestamp. A reviewer records the interpretation and next step, so a later reader can retrace the decision.
Working principles
A research note should be traceable.
- EvidenceURL, timestamp, and excerpt stay in one record.
- JudgmentObservation and interpretation are kept separate.
- AccountabilityA named reviewer owns the next decision.